Fossil vomit contains new species of pterosaur from Brazil



One hundred and ten million years ago in what is now Brazil, a dinosaur’s dinner got the best of it. The reptile regurgitated its meal, leaving behind a pile of vomit that happened to fossilize—a stroke of geologic luck that preserved the remains of a newly discovered species. 

When paleontologists recently examined the petrified puke (pictured), known scientifically as a regurgitalite, they found the bones within it came from two pterosaurs representing a previously unknown species. The discovery, published this week in Scientific Reports, is the first instance of an animal being described based on remains found in fossilized vomit. 

The team named the new pterosaur Bakiribu waridza, which means “comb mouth” in the Indigenous Kariri language spoken in northeastern Brazil’s Araripe region, where the fossil was unearthed. The name references the animal’s bristlelike teeth, which it likely used to catch crustaceans and other small aquatic animals. The first filter-feeding pterosaur ever found in Brazil, B. waridza exhibits a mix of features seen in both older pterosaurs from Germany and slightly younger species from Argentina.  

It's hard to tell which species of dinosaur devoured the two pterosaurs and then threw them back up. The researchers think the most likely culprit is a spinosaur (illustration), a group of dinosaurs with crocodilelike jaws that dominated the region during the early Cretaceous period. These predators apparently had a taste for pterosaurs: Another pterosaur skeleton from this area of Brazil was found with a spinosaur tooth lodged in its neck.


Trouvé ici.







Andrias matthewi (Hodari Nundu)



Do you know what Hodari and a giant salamander have in common? Neither of us knows if a giant salamander can eat a baby gomphothere. But that didn´t stop us from trying :B

This encounter may have taken place somewhere in North America during the Miocene, around 16-13 million years ago. Lakes and rivers at the time would've been inhabited by an incredible amphibian, the giant salamander Andrias matthewi. Today, Andrias salamanders are found only in Asia, specifically China and Japan, and they are still the largest amphibians in the world, reaching up to 1.5, sometimes 1.8 m long in the largest species! Andrias has an interesting story because it was first named based on a fossil skeleton found in Germany in 1726. People at the time thought it was a human skeleton (it was missing its tail, which surely helped), and because the concepts of evolution, extinction and deep time were not yet well understood or accepted, it was named Homo diluvii testis, meaning, "the man who witnessed the Flood".

Subsequently it was found to be non human and variously suggested to be a catfish and even a lizard, before finally being recognized as a salamander in the early 19th century. Eventually it was named "Andrias", meaning something like "after man's image" as a reference to the initial confusion.

Both the European fossils and the North American ones show that giant salamanders, today critically endangered and geographically restricted, were once much more widespread. They also got bigger- potentially much bigger. Andrias matthewi here may be the largest true salamander known from the fossil record. One specimen from the US, known from its fossil jaw was estimated in 1.52 m which is plenty big, but the biggest come from Saskwatchewan, Canada, where another specimen was estimated at up to 2.3 m!

Other than their size they would've been pretty similar in habits to today's giant salamanders from Asia; ambush predators, entirely aquatic, mostly nocturnal, and pretty voracious, tho here its attacking a baby Zygolophodon may be more a defensive reaction at being stepped on, or maybe confusion due to poor eyesight. Tho not dangerous to humans, giant salamanders are known to bite hard!


Trouvé ici.


What Earth Was Like After The Worst Extinction (ExtinctZoo)




 

There's more than one way to build a tree, 374m-year-old fossils reveal



Extraits de cet article:

In the world of knee-high land plants 400m years ago, the battle to grow tall was won by plants which found biomechanical solutions to fight gravity. Vascular plants had already evolved a plumbing system, allowing them to transport water, and the food produced by photosynthesis, around the plant. The water-conducting cells in the xylem – dead, hollow and stiffened by the polymer lignin – also afforded them some structural support. But there are limits to the height that a plant can grow with a stem of fixed girth.

In modern trees, trunks grow outwards as well as upwards. Known as secondary thickening, a ring of dividing cells beneath the bark, called the vascular cambium, produces new xylem and phloem tissue. This is what wood is: secondary xylem, composed of dead lignified cells, now employed by trees as a building material to allow them to continue to grow tall.

Plants producing wood locked up carbon extracted from the atmosphere during photosynthesis and, when trees died, resulted in its burial in sediments. This storage over geological time as coal (which humans are so keen to dig up, burn and release the carbon from) changed how carbon cycled through our ecosystems. The first forests transformed our planet in other, less obvious, ways too. Tree root systems stabilised soil, changing the landscape and affecting how minerals in the sediments weather. These changes in weathering take carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, producing carbonic acid, which ends up in river systems, and ultimately puts the carbon in the ocean. The Earth’s carbon cycle, climate and the evolution of forests are inextricably linked.

How did the first trees solve their engineering challenge? Some of them used the same strategy as modern trees. Archaeopteris (not to be confused with the much more famous Jurassic bird Archaeopteryx) was one of the earliest trees, appearing in the Late Devonian, around 380 millon years ago, and found world-wide. Up to 20 metres tall, and with a trunk up to 1.5 metres in diameter, Archaeopteris has typical secondary thickening produced by a vascular cambium ring. It had seasonal growth rings like a modern temperate tree, and had flattened photosynthesising branches which could almost be described as leaves. Archaeopteris is one of several types of plant grouped together as progymnosperms: plants which had seed plant characteristics like wood production, but which still reproduced with spores.

Another group of early trees solved the structural problem of being a tree very differently. The gloriously-named cladoxylopsids first appeared around 390 Ma, and have been well-studied from sites in Germany, Scotland and USA. The fossil forest at Gilboa quarry in New York state, where tree stumps known as Eospermatopteris, preserved as sandstone casts, up to one metre in diameter, in life position, has been studied since the 1870s. These trees were reconstructed in 2007 as Wattieza, after a fossil tree complete with a palm-like crown of leafy fronds was discovered nearby.

New discoveries in China from Hong-He Xu and colleagues, from Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Cardiff University and Binghamton University, have revealed the strange anatomy of the trunk of cladoxylopsid trees. Where the Gilboa Wattieza trees are preserved as sandstone casts with little detail, the new fossils dating from 374Ma, from Xinjiang, China, are silicified, preserving the cellular details of their wood. They show that rather than a simple ring producing secondary tissue, cladoxylopsids had many separate and distinct xylem strands around the outside of the trunk, each one producing its own thickening rings, almost like a mini tree. An intricate network of interconnecting xylem tissue joined up the strands throughout the trunk, which was otherwise hollow.

It is the “ordinary” cortical tissue between the xylem strands which appears to have driven girth increase in these trees, by having such a high rate of cell proliferation that it pushed the ever thicker mini-trees apart, ripping the connecting xylem tissues in the process. The tree was in a state of continual, controlled internal collapse, repairing its internal tears as it grew. This seems like an incredibly over-complicated way to be a tree. Some modern palm trees do increase their girth by primary growth but in a much less complex way. Perhaps the cost of this elaborate anatomy was a factor in the demise of the cladoxylopsids, which disappear from the fossil record soon after these Chinese finds. These findings are yet another demonstration how much we still do not know about the diversity of plants and their anatomy through deep time.



 

Les pélycosaures



Publié par le Musée Redpath:

Cette mâchoire de pélycosaure a été découverte dans un puits sur l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard au 19e siècle. 
Bien avant l’ère des dinosaures, les pélycosaures dominaient la Terre. Ces vertébrés font partie des premiers synapsides, le groupe ancestral qui donnera naissance aux mammifères. 

Le célèbre Dimetrodon, reconnaissable à sa grande voile dorsale, est l’un des exemples les plus fascinants de ce groupe ! 
 


Le bloc erratique du mont Royal



On appelle "bloc erratique" tout bloc rocheux déplacé par un glacier, jusqu'à ce qu'il se retrouve sur de la roche en place de composition différente. Ce bloc de gabbro montérégien se retrouve sur les roches calcaires du groupe de Trenton. La distance de transport du bloc demeure inconnue et pourrait être aussi courte que 100 mètres. Le poids du bloc est estimé à environ 7 000 kilos.
 
La photo a été prise tôt au printemps, avant que la végétation dissimule le bloc.
Le mont Royal étant situé au coeur d'une ville depuis quelques siècles, il n'est pas assuré que le déplacement du bloc ait une cause naturelle. Cependant, l'état de désagrégation de la partie basale du bloc indique que le dernier mouvement est très ancien.
Compte tenu de l'altitude du bloc (190 m), en dessous du niveau maximum (200 m) de la mer de Champlain, il est possible que ce bloc ait été transporté par des glaces flottant sur l'ancienne mer de Champlain. Le transport aurait alors une origine glacielle (glace flottante) plutôt que glaciaire (glacier s'écoulant par gravité).

En conclusion, si la cause du transport du bloc est naturelle, seule la glace peut déplacer une telle charge. Cette glace peut être celle du glacier qui recouvrait la totalité du territoire, il y a 20 000 ans, mais cette glace peut aussi être celle de la banquise qui dérivait sur la mer de Champlain, il y a 13 000 ans.

Comment s'y rendre :
À partir de la maison Smith, suivez le chemin Olmstead jusqu'à l'intersection du premier sentier qui coupe le chemin Olmstead pour descendre vers le lac des castors. Avancez de 20 mètres dans ce sentier forestier et tournez à droite au premier embranchement rencontré. Avancez d'un autre 15 mètres, jusqu'à un autre embranchement, côté gauche, cet embranchement est maintenant condamné par une clôture. On peut encore apercevoir le bloc erratique dans la forêt, à une distance d'environ 10 mètres de la clôture, en hiver et au printemps, avant l'apparition du feuillage des végétaux.

Localisation au GPS :
45˚ 29' 58,6"N
73˚ 35' 35,5"W

Trouvé ici.