C'est quoi le rapport? J'y viens.
L'explication généralement acceptée pour expliquer que nos ancêtres soient devenus bipèdes, c'est la disparition des forêts humides africaines au profit de la savane. Nos ancêtres se seraient donc adaptés à ce nouvel environnement en marchant debout, ce qui leur permettait de voir très loin au-dessus des hautes herbes.
L'explication semble parfaitement plausible. Le problème, c'est qu'on a alors fait la découverte de Ardi: une créature bipède qui vivait avant la disparition des forêts.
On a donc besoin d'une autre explication. Voici celle qui est proposée par Owen Lovejoy de la Kent State University:
In apes (...) males find mates the good old-fashioned apish way: by fighting with other males for access to fertile females. Success, measured in number of offspring, goes to macho males with big sharp canine teeth who try to mate with as many ovulating females as possible. Sex is best done quickly—hence those penis bristles, which accelerate ejaculation—with the advantage to the male with big testicles carrying a heavy load of sperm. Among females, the winners are those who flaunt their fertility with swollen genitals or some other prominent display of ovulation, so those big alpha dudes will take notice and give them a tumble, providing a baby with his big alpha genes.
Let’s suppose that some lesser male, with poor little stubby canines, figures out that he can entice a fertile female into mating by bringing her some food. That sometimes happens among living chimpanzees, for instance when a female rewards a male for presenting her with a tasty gift of colobus monkey.
Among Ardipithecus’s ancestors, such a strategy could catch on if searching for food required a lot of time and exposure to predators. Males would be far more successful food-providers if they had their hands free to carry home loads of fruits and tubers—which would favor walking on two legs. Females would come to prefer good, steady providers with smaller canines over the big fierce-toothed ones who left as soon as they spot another fertile female. The results, says Lovejoy, are visible in Ardipithecus, which had small canines even in males and walked upright.
Lovejoy’s explanation for the origin of bipedality thus comes down to the monogamous pair bond. Far from being a recent evolutionary innovation, as many people assume, he believes the behavior goes back all the way to near the beginning of our lineage some six million years ago.
But there is one other, essential piece to this puzzle that leaves no trace in the fossil record. If the female knew when she was fertile, she could basically cheat the system by taking all the food offered by her milquetoast of a provider, then cuckold him with a dominant male when she was ovulating, scoring the best of both worlds. The food-for-sex contract thus depends on what Lovejoy calls “the most unique human character”—ovulation that not only goes unannounced to the males of the group, but is concealed even from the female herself.
Regular meals, monogamy, and discretion--who would have thought our origins were so sedate?
C'est une théorie fort intéressante qui a le mérite d'expliquer d'autres caractéristiques physiques humaines, en plus de la bipédie: les testicules moins volumineuses des mâles et l'ignorance complète du moment de l'ovulation des femelles.
Image trouvée ici.
L'explication généralement acceptée pour expliquer que nos ancêtres soient devenus bipèdes, c'est la disparition des forêts humides africaines au profit de la savane. Nos ancêtres se seraient donc adaptés à ce nouvel environnement en marchant debout, ce qui leur permettait de voir très loin au-dessus des hautes herbes.
L'explication semble parfaitement plausible. Le problème, c'est qu'on a alors fait la découverte de Ardi: une créature bipède qui vivait avant la disparition des forêts.
On a donc besoin d'une autre explication. Voici celle qui est proposée par Owen Lovejoy de la Kent State University:
In apes (...) males find mates the good old-fashioned apish way: by fighting with other males for access to fertile females. Success, measured in number of offspring, goes to macho males with big sharp canine teeth who try to mate with as many ovulating females as possible. Sex is best done quickly—hence those penis bristles, which accelerate ejaculation—with the advantage to the male with big testicles carrying a heavy load of sperm. Among females, the winners are those who flaunt their fertility with swollen genitals or some other prominent display of ovulation, so those big alpha dudes will take notice and give them a tumble, providing a baby with his big alpha genes.
Let’s suppose that some lesser male, with poor little stubby canines, figures out that he can entice a fertile female into mating by bringing her some food. That sometimes happens among living chimpanzees, for instance when a female rewards a male for presenting her with a tasty gift of colobus monkey.
Among Ardipithecus’s ancestors, such a strategy could catch on if searching for food required a lot of time and exposure to predators. Males would be far more successful food-providers if they had their hands free to carry home loads of fruits and tubers—which would favor walking on two legs. Females would come to prefer good, steady providers with smaller canines over the big fierce-toothed ones who left as soon as they spot another fertile female. The results, says Lovejoy, are visible in Ardipithecus, which had small canines even in males and walked upright.
Lovejoy’s explanation for the origin of bipedality thus comes down to the monogamous pair bond. Far from being a recent evolutionary innovation, as many people assume, he believes the behavior goes back all the way to near the beginning of our lineage some six million years ago.
But there is one other, essential piece to this puzzle that leaves no trace in the fossil record. If the female knew when she was fertile, she could basically cheat the system by taking all the food offered by her milquetoast of a provider, then cuckold him with a dominant male when she was ovulating, scoring the best of both worlds. The food-for-sex contract thus depends on what Lovejoy calls “the most unique human character”—ovulation that not only goes unannounced to the males of the group, but is concealed even from the female herself.
Regular meals, monogamy, and discretion--who would have thought our origins were so sedate?
C'est une théorie fort intéressante qui a le mérite d'expliquer d'autres caractéristiques physiques humaines, en plus de la bipédie: les testicules moins volumineuses des mâles et l'ignorance complète du moment de l'ovulation des femelles.
Image trouvée ici.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire